Scroll up
Skip to main content

Richard Hamilton, Just what is it that makes today’s home so different, so appealing?, 1956 

© R. Hamilton. All Rights Reserved, DACS 2018.

Despite his insistence on having a solitary position in the art world, Francis Bacon was not an isolated figure.[1]He was well-embedded in London’s cultural scene and his work shows distinct points of contact with a number of contemporaries, such as the members of the so-called ‘Independent Group’. In 1952 the Independent Group seceded from the Institute of Contemporary Art, with whom they nevertheless remained associated. The Group remained active until the mid-1950s. Core members included Eduardo Paolozzi, Nigel Henderson, Alison and Peter Smithson, Richard Hamilton, and the theorists Robert Melville and Lawrence Alloway. The artists of the Independent Group came from a variety of backgrounds and worked in diverse media, but all embraced contemporary Popular Culture and the idea that art needed to be freed, as Alloway put it, from ‘the iron curtain of traditional aesthetics which separate absolutely art from non-art.’[2]

  • Richard Hamilton at the opening of Bacon's retrospective at Tate Gallery, 1985 © Tate, 2018

  • Private view card for Francis Bacon, ICA, 1955. Photo: Mark Blower.


Collages, often compiled from ostensibly trivial and sometimes found imagery, were regarded as an especially suitable medium for articulating their point of view. Two works from 1956 are prime examples of the Group’s inventiveness and candour in relation to sources and process: Henderson’s Head of a Man, a re-photographed assemblage of the artist’s own experimental photographs superimposed on a large photograph of a head, and Hamilton’s Just what is it that makes today’s home so different, so appealing?, a collage of figures and objects cut from advertisements and magazine features. 



Richard Hamilton, Just what is it that makes today’s home so different, so appealing?, 1956

Richard Hamilton, Just what is it that makes today’s home so different, so appealing?, 1956 © R. Hamilton. All Rights Reserved, DACS 2018.


Bacon was neither a member of the Independent Group, nor did he ever take part in their meetings. Alloway remarked flippantly that the closest he ever got to the group’s gatherings at the ICA on Dover Street, W1, was Wheeler's fish restaurant on Old Compton Street.[3]Yet, by the early 1950s, Bacon had friendly connections to all of the individuals involved in the ICA, including the Independent Group members Henderson and Paolozzi.[4]An original photographic print from Henderson’s series of ‘stressed photographs’, Bathers, c.1953, unearthed from Bacon’s Reece Mews studio after his death, suggests a professional exchange, too.[5]


Nigel Henderson, The Bathers, c.1953

Bacon studio material, Nigel Henderson, The Bathers, c.1953. Collection: Dublin City Gallery The Hugh Lane Photo © Nigel Henderson and the Mayor Gallery, Source Clipping © The Estate of Francis Bacon



Bacon’s eclectic collection of working documents, which included original photographic prints, medical textbooks, publications on big game hunting, golf and gardening, newspapers, magazines and books on subjects ranging from cave art to contemporary painting, paralleled the IG’s democratic attitude towards visual stimuli. Just like them, Bacon absorbed ‘low art’ sources, as, for example, in Study for the Nurse in the Film Battleship Potemkin, 1957, which is based on a scene from Sergei Eisenstein’s silent movie from 1925. However, as regards material and technique, Bacon remained a traditional painter. He never created any collages or integrated newspaper cutting into an artwork. On the contrary, he despised such literal approaches and dismissed artists employing them as ‘mixed media jackdaws’ who had ’not sufficiently digested’ their source material.[6]In contrast to his peers at the Independent Group, Bacon remained secretive about his appropriation of photographs and printed mass media material, which was only explored in more detail after his death.


[1]Cf. David Sylvester, The Brutality of Fact: interviews with Francis Bacon, London: Thames & Hudson, 1987, p.67.

[2]Lawrence Alloway, ‘Personal Statement’, Ark19, p.28, op.cit. Martin Harrison, Transition: The London Art Scene in the Fifties, London: Merrell in association with Barbican Art, 2002, p.96.

[3]Lawrence Alloway, 'Retrospective Statement', pp.49-53, in exh. cat., The Independent Group: Postwar Britain and the Aesthetics of Plenty, ed. David Robbins, February 1- April 11 1990, Institute of Contemporary Arts, London, The MIT Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1990, p.49.

[4]Cf. Victoria Walsh, ‘Real imagination is technical imagination’, pp.74-89, in Francis Bacon, Tate Gallery, London, 11 September 2008- 4 January 2009, London: Tate Publishing 2008, p.78; Martin Harrison, In Camera: Francis Bacon Photography, Film and the Practice of Painting, Thames & Hudson: London, 2005, p.111.

[5]Bacon studio material, Nigel Henderson, Bathers, c.1953, today at Dublin City Gallery The Hugh Lane.

[6]Francis Bacon quoted in John Russell, Francis Bacon, London: Thames & Hudson, 1979, p.71.